Author Michelle Malkin decided that the ugly paisley scarf Rachael sported in the ad was part of some conspiracy to mainstream pro-Palestine/anti-war wear. Malkin made some vague connections to support her argument, and as a result, the donut chain yanked the ad to avoid any misconceptions.
One should also note that Malkin wrote a book entitled In Defense of Internment: The case for "racial profiling" in World War II and the War on Terror. The book takes a favorable view of Japanese internment camps, and uses them as an argument for...heck, you get the drift. Some people are impressed by the amount of research she incorporates into the book. I admit that I am impressed too. She conducted a whole lot of research and managed to draw the most ridiculous revisionist conclusion. That takes talent. Perhaps she used this same "talent" to draw her conclusion regarding Rachael's paisley scarf?
In a follow-up to the original scarfccusation post, Ms. Malkin (I am NOT posting a link. If you want to read it, you can google her yourself) opines that people who dismiss her view wouldn't be so forgiving if someone marketed a burberry plaid klan style hood. While that is probably true, it isn't a parallel argument. People have been wearing ugly scarves for a while, klan hoods--not so much.
"Oh, yeah. Well, that's why I wear sterling silver. I don't want to wear gold because that's what thugs wear," said the sarcastic lady while rolling her eyes.
Malkin goes on to say that we have to be diligent in a post-9/11 world about fashion that might lead to the mainstreaming of violence. I guess we need to add a fashion police division to the Department of Homeland Security?
How about an alternate theory? Prince wrote a song called Paisley Park (I think it was on an album by the same name). According to Prince:
The girl on the seesaw is laughing 'cause love is the color this place, it imparts. Admission is easy. Just say you believe, and come to this place in your heart. Paisley Park is in out hearts.
Maybe the paisley scarf encourages seesawing and laughter? Did Dunkin Donuts even consider Prince's point of view?
Of course not. 'cause that would be breathtakingly stupid.
1 comment:
That woman to appear on the Colbert Report.
This is Colbert's raison d'ĂȘtre.
She deserves the same attention he gave Dinseh D'Souza.
Post a Comment